[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 18:18:05 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1001 (Gnus v5.10.1) XEmacs/21.4 (Portable Code, linux) |
>>>>> "Miles" == Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
> $ tla logs
> address@hidden/smsparser--dev--0.3
[...]
> address@hidden/smsparser--prod--0.2
> And that's what I meant.
Miles> That's not a list of logs... I agree that it's a useful
Miles> function, but the command name should reflect what it
Miles> prints. :-) I'm suggesting to use either `tla log-versions'
Miles> or `tla logs --versions' to print the above info.
I find neither of those at all useful in figuring out what the command
prints. "sources" comes closer, but I don't much like that, either.
"origins"? "roots"? "ancestors"? "progenitors"? "uncles"? (I think
I'm getting too silly, I'll stop there.)
--
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls, Miles Bader, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls, Miles Bader, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls, Miles Bader, 2003/09/19
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=