[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml? |
Date: |
26 Sep 2003 17:42:36 +0900 |
Samium Gromoff <address@hidden> writes:
> (3) Can not send modifications to Linus as GNU patches.
> (because handling -/+ renames in the light of accepting
> side modifying the target file complicates things)
Actually this is not a problem as long as he uses BK -- it has some good
tools for dealing with deducing renames from patches. :-)
For the longer term where linus uses arch too, defining a
patch-file-superset that more accurately captures changesets, and
writing a command to export/import them, is not very hard (and even
without that, doing `detection' similar to BK isn't hard either -- both
I and other people have done it already in various scripts).
-Miles
--
I'm beginning to think that life is just one long Yoko Ono album; no rhyme
or reason, just a lot of incoherent shrieks and then it's over. --Ian Wolff
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Inertia on lkml?, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Inertia on lkml?, Zack Brown, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Inertia on lkml?, Adam Spiers, 2003/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Inertia on lkml?, Zack Brown, 2003/09/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Miles Bader, 2003/09/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Dustin Sallings, 2003/09/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Bruce Stephens, 2003/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Jason McCarty, 2003/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Samium Gromoff, 2003/09/26
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Robin Farine, 2003/09/26
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: log-buf-len dynamic (fwd), Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/26