[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: fixing and extending "selected commit"
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: fixing and extending "selected commit" |
Date: |
02 Oct 2003 06:40:57 +0900 |
Robert Anderson <address@hidden> writes:
> File and directory limits are an essential piece of that, but add in
> hunk-level limits and you've got a real winner.
Sure hunk-level limits would be nice, but I think they introduce a
number of new problems -- such as `how do you specify them?' (whereas
this is fairly obvious with file-based limits).
Even if hunk-limits are planned, I'd really like to see them added
later, _after_ the file-based limits are committed, so we can actually
use the file-based limits sometime soon.
-Miles
--
Somebody has to do something, and it's just incredibly pathetic that it
has to be us. -- Jerry Garcia
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: fixing and extending "selected commit", (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: fixing and extending "selected commit", Miles Bader, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: fixing and extending "selected commit", Robert Anderson, 2003/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: fixing and extending "selected commit", Miles Bader, 2003/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: fixing and extending "selected commit", Robert Anderson, 2003/10/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: fixing and extending "selected commit", Miles Bader, 2003/10/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: fixing and extending "selected commit", Robert Anderson, 2003/10/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: fixing and extending "selected commit", Miles Bader, 2003/10/05
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: fixing and extending "selected commit", Pau Aliagas, 2003/10/03
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] fixing and extending "selected commit", Denys Duchier, 2003/10/02
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] fixing and extending "selected commit", Robert Anderson, 2003/10/01