[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit |
Date: |
08 Oct 2003 06:57:21 +0900 |
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> writes:
> Somewhere in the introductory docs, maybe the old home page, a remark
> is made that any tarball of an arch project would be an arch workspace
> when untarred. So this possibility has been considered a feature at
> least as long as I've been following arch.
Sure, it's a feature that it's _possible_ (that is, that {arch} is
basically location independent), but the question is whether it's usual
practice, and whether it should be recommended.
I like arch, so as long as {arch} is not excessively large, I have no
particular objection to including it, but I suppose some people might get
snarky about it...
Hmmm, if someone gets a tar file containing an {arch}, and wants to put it
into a local archive, what do they have to do? Is `tla set-tree-version;
tla commit' enough (or should it be `import'? I can never remember the
difference)?
-Miles
--
P.S. All information contained in the above letter is false,
for reasons of military security.
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Miles Bader, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Pau Aliagas, 2003/10/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Miles Bader, 2003/10/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Robert Collins, 2003/10/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Andrew Suffield, 2003/10/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/10/07
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Tom Lord, 2003/10/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Robin Farine, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic, Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/10/03
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic, Miles Bader, 2003/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic, Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/10/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic, Miles Bader, 2003/10/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic, Davide Libenzi, 2003/10/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic, Miles Bader, 2003/10/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic, Davide Libenzi, 2003/10/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic, Robert Collins, 2003/10/05