[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch On Cygwin(Win32)
From: |
Naushit Sakarvadia |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch On Cygwin(Win32) |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Nov 2003 11:42:30 -0600 |
> Having said that, if an arch redesign does not occur, then wouldn't it
> be far safer to implement the hackerlab vu_ calls to use the "W" Win32
> directory calls directly, rather than change Cygwin? I just hacked
> successfully safe_mkdir to call CreateDirectoryW as a proof of concept,
> and this would seem *much* easier than the Cygwin patch... Any
> drawbacks to this approach?
Exactly , what I was also thinking......
I dont see any drawback....I guess its more appropriate , that way we dont
have to worry about cygwin .dll version.
I vote for direct chages to Arch then going thru cygwin patches.
--Naushit.
- RE: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch On Cygwin(Win32), (continued)
- RE: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch On Cygwin(Win32), Parker, Ron, 2003/11/13
- RE: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch On Cygwin(Win32), Parker, Ron, 2003/11/13
- RE: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch On Cygwin(Win32), Parker, Ron, 2003/11/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch On Cygwin(Win32), John Kinson, 2003/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch On Cygwin(Win32), Robert Collins, 2003/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch On Cygwin(Win32), John Kinson, 2003/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch On Cygwin(Win32), Robert Collins, 2003/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch On Cygwin(Win32), John Kinson, 2003/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch On Cygwin(Win32), Robert Collins, 2003/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch On Cygwin(Win32), John Kinson, 2003/11/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch On Cygwin(Win32), Robert Collins, 2003/11/20
RE: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch On Cygwin(Win32), Parker, Ron, 2003/11/13