[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0 |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Dec 2003 14:10:53 -0800 (PST) |
Tom> The only argument against I see left is that while encryption
Tom> of changesets, import copies, CONTINUATION files, log
Tom> messages, archive-cached revisions and (perhaps) checksum
Tom> files is easy -- encryption of category, branch, version, and
Tom> revision _names_ is not. That's why wonder if a VPN isn't a
Tom> better solution.
Brian> With vpn/sftp, if somebody breaks into the server, they get
Brian> to read access to everything.
Ack. Don't get me wrong, I'm warming up to the idea. Not convinced
yet, but considering.
Someone should pay for it or do it themselves, really: Non-commercial
FOSS projects mostly don't care about this kind of stuff while
companies, _especially_ with such heavy emphasis on outsourcing these
days, are the more likely to benefit.
-t
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Florian Weimer, 2003/12/31
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Andrew Suffield, 2003/12/31
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Florian Weimer, 2003/12/31
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Tom Lord, 2003/12/31
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Andrew Suffield, 2003/12/31
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Tom Lord, 2003/12/31
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0, Brian May, 2003/12/31
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0,
Tom Lord <=