Re: [Gnu-arch-users] subversion vs. cvs (vs. arch) over on pgsql-hackers

[Dustin Sallings]

On Mar 25, 2004, at 16:28, James Blackwell wrote:

> Though you don't hear about it much, centralized support is built right
> into arch. Just have everybody commit to the same archive. Everything
> will just work.
>
> I use this when working with people on web-based projects. Because of
> the nature of the beast, web based projects demand centralized
> development. Arch works absolutely *great*.

	That's kind of a difficult thing to get started on.  It's hard to say 
things like, ``you won't want to do it that way,'' which is probably 
the right answer.  I like to just say that it supports a centralized 
development and let people figure out what to do with it after they get 
started.

	I mean, a web project can be just as decentralized as anything else.  
CVS will get you fairly focused on one way to do things, though.

--
Dustin Sallings