[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gnu-arch-users] Re: cached rev support in pyarch

From: Robert Collins
Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cached rev support in pyarch
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 19:28:11 +1000

On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 18:53, David Allouche wrote:

> PS: in a future version, I am considering dropping the iter prefix from
> most (or all) commands which create iterators, not sure whether that
> would be a good idea or not. What is your opinion?

clarity is good. revisions() might return a bag of some sort or an
iterable. iter_revisions() however is unambigous.

GPG key available at: <>.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]