[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process
From: |
James Blackwell |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Sep 2004 14:27:48 -0400 |
/me hugs ddaa and asuffield in a kind, manly sort of way.
I know you're both nice guys. There's something really bothering one of
you two if you're not getting along. Lets all take a step back, calm
down, and remember that here we act like professionals. That way nobody
takes things personally, and nobody gets the mistaken impression that we
fight like kids. :)
>> > PEP is a different process than SRFI.
So what? According to their parent companies, dial and irish spring are
different, but as far as I can tell, they both do a reasonably good job
of removing the smell of my armpits. :)
Rather than go back and forth about whether this process is the same or
different from that process, why don't we discuss the merits and
drawbacks of having a (any) process first.
If we come to agreement on that, and the agreement happens to be
"review process good", then we can come up with a handful of various
existing processes, pick them apart for their successes and failures,
and implement an amalgum of the best features of each.
>>
>> <snip list of things not relevant to the process>
>
> We must be using different definition of "process" then. I will not play
> dictionary games with you.
>
> I took your message as an opportunity to attract the attention of
> receptive readers to differences between SRFI and PEP which I consider
> important and relevant to the definition of the arch proposal process.
>
> You can bring a horse to the water, but you cannot make him drink.
>
> --
> -- ddaa
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnu-arch-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
>
> GNU arch home page:
> http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
>
--
James Blackwell Try something fun: For the next 24 hours, give
Smile more! each person you meet a compliment!
GnuPG (ID 06357400) AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D 247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process, David Allouche, 2004/09/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process, John Meinel, 2004/09/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process, Andrew Suffield, 2004/09/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process, David Allouche, 2004/09/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process, Andrew Suffield, 2004/09/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process, David Allouche, 2004/09/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process, Andrew Suffield, 2004/09/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process,
James Blackwell <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process, David Allouche, 2004/09/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process, Tom Lord, 2004/09/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2004/09/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process, Tom Lord, 2004/09/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2004/09/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process, James Blackwell, 2004/09/02