[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] library-add w/o ancestor checking?
From: |
Adrian Irving-Beer |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] library-add w/o ancestor checking? |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Nov 2004 16:27:09 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
Any way I can get library-add (in sparse mode, presumably) to add,
say, patch-150 from my archive (a known cacherev) without bothering to
go back through the project's entire lifespan searching for an
ancestor in the library?
In particular, this revlib is 100% empty, so it's not just slow to
search for an ancestor in the library, it's completely pointless. ;)
In no way a show-stopper.. if archive access were *that* slow, I'd be
mirroring on a closer server to my target. But I just wish there was
a way to tell the system what I already know.
And further to that, is there any way (at a later patch, 194 in this
case) to tell a greedy add to stop at that last cacherev (150),
without doing the sparse-150 add above (with or without the extended
ancestry checking)?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [Gnu-arch-users] library-add w/o ancestor checking?,
Adrian Irving-Beer <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] library-add w/o ancestor checking?, Zenaan Harkness, 2004/11/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] library-add w/o ancestor checking?, John A Meinel, 2004/11/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] library-add w/o ancestor checking?, Adrian Irving-Beer, 2004/11/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] library-add w/o ancestor checking?, Aaron Bentley, 2004/11/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: library-add w/o ancestor checking?, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: library-add w/o ancestor checking?, John A Meinel, 2004/11/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: library-add w/o ancestor checking?, Robert Collins, 2004/11/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: library-add w/o ancestor checking?, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/03
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] library-add w/o ancestor checking?, Aaron Bentley, 2004/11/02