[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Apr 2006 11:27:32 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
"Andy Tai" <address@hidden> writes:
> I think it is well agreed that the current tla's strong ties to "certain
> aspects" (but not all) of the POSIX environment is a weakness and to work well
> on Microsoft Windows is a desired feature for Arch 2.0 and Tom's prototype
> clearly shows that.
GNU Arch is/should be targeting the GNU system. Therefore, portability
to other systems can arguably be an advantage, but I don't think it
should be a strong requirement.
So, if Windows-portability has an negative impact on the design, then
I'd reject it. If it doesn't, then we can make it part of the plan.
That's roughly the "official" GNU policy [0].
For instance, it seems that `revc' could potentially work fine on
Windows because it doesn't rely on any Unix/GNU idiosyncrasy. OTOH,
`tla' builds on the ability to use long paths, hard links, and so on,
which Windows doesn't provide. Thus, maybe we should not worry too much
about Windows for `tla' because porting it there may require
unacceptably constraining the design.
Thanks,
Ludovic.
[0] http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.html#System-Portability
[Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? (was re: Google...), Thomas Lord, 2006/04/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? (was re: Google...), Aldrik KLEBER, 2006/04/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? (was re: Google...), Andy Tai, 2006/04/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? (was re: Google...), Aldrik KLEBER, 2006/04/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Peter Conrad, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Aldrik KLEBER, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Mark Flacy, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Aldrik KLEBER, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Thomas Lord, 2006/04/21
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Peter Conrad, 2006/04/21
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/04/21
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Peter Conrad, 2006/04/21
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Karel Gardas, 2006/04/21