Re: [GNU Crypto] version 2.0

[Raif S. Naffah]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 01:42 pm, Casey Marshall wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 01:13:01PM +1000, Raif S. Naffah wrote:
> > On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 11:37 am, Casey Marshall wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 08:45:30AM +1000, Raif S. Naffah wrote:
> > > > this is the list of TODOs i propose to finalise before
> > > > releasing version 2.0 of the library:
> > > >
> > > > * finalise the documentation: javadoc html pages, info and pdf
> > > > - cm, rsn
> > >
> > > Probably a version of the manual available from the home page.
> >
> > yes definetly.
> >
> >
> > anybody knows/uses the Bouvard & Pecuchet javadoc browser
> > <http://web.tiscali.it/farello/bp/intro.html>?
> >
> > > What formats should be kept there?
> >
> > pdf for sure.  may be tex and dvi?  i'm discounting html because
> > the javadoc html output seems more functional.
>
> Agreed. I think PDF and PostScript (probably gzipped) would be the
> most useful.
>
> > > > * implement Diffie-Hellman key agreement - fs
> > > > * implement and retrofit Properties - cm
> > > > * implement HAVAL hash - rsn
> > > > * implement CAST-128 - rsn
> > > > * support kissme as java interpreter - ???
> > > > * support jikes-rvm as java interpreter - ???
> > >
> > > I don't know if you mean at the configure step, but I think that
> > > eventually we should use a better way of specifying compilers and
> > > interpreters.
> >
> > i meant at configure time, similar to the way we currently handle
> > bytecode compilers.
> >
> > > There are some Java-specific m4 macros floating around, which
> > > (for example) allow compilers to be specified in environment
> > > variables, similar to the way you can say "./configure CC=gcc"
> > > &c.
> >
> > if somebody has already done that work, we dont need to re-invent
> > the wheel.  any specific urls?
>
> <http://www.gnu.org/software/ac-archive/htmldoc/index.html#JAVA_SUPPO
>RT>
>
> I use some slightly modified versions of these in new autoconf
> setups, and have found that they work pretty well.

they look interesting.  i'll have a closer look.

thanks + cheers;
rsn
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Que du magnifique

iD8DBQE+6pur+e1AKnsTRiERA+12AKCzLGsCwAufSX6izrXXPKlNtKjoVACfeRMi
rqPbZ3yq5kOevpEWR3eGsG0=
=+V6h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----