[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is the GPL all encompassing?
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: Is the GPL all encompassing? |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Sep 2008 03:17:17 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) |
amicus_curious wrote:
My belief is that the GPL is totally unnecessary because what it
> seeks to prevent isn't a viable outcome to beging with.
It seeks to prevent a software user from being unable to run,
read, change, or share a program. Since software users are
routinely denied these freedoms, I fail to see why you think
what the GPL prevents is not a viable outcome.
- Is the GPL all encompassing?, Rjack, 2008/09/20
- Re: Is the GPL all encompassing?, amicus_curious, 2008/09/20
- Re: Is the GPL all encompassing?, Rjack, 2008/09/20
- Re: Is the GPL all encompassing?, amicus_curious, 2008/09/20
- Re: Is the GPL all encompassing?,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: Is the GPL all encompassing?, amicus_curious, 2008/09/21
- Re: Is the GPL all encompassing?, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/21
- Re: Is the GPL all encompassing?, amicus_curious, 2008/09/22
- Re: Is the GPL all encompassing?, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/22
- Re: Is the GPL all encompassing?, Rjack, 2008/09/22
- Re: Is the GPL all encompassing?, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/22
- Re: Is the GPL all encompassing?, amicus_curious, 2008/09/22
- Re: Is the GPL all encompassing?, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/22
- Re: Is the GPL all encompassing?, amicus_curious, 2008/09/22
- Re: Is the GPL all encompassing?, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/22