[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:17:25 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) |
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
It is the same "mere aggregation" (copying but not creating a
> derivative work) as in the other two cases
Aggregation for the purpose of transmission is not the same thing
as use in a combined work. If your arguments have reduced down to
repeated claims of "red is blue", fine. I will just keep pointing
out that it is not.
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, (continued)
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/20
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Rjack, 2009/03/20
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Rjack, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/23