gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again


From: Alan Mackenzie
Subject: Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:13:49 +0000 (UTC)
User-agent: tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-RELEASE (i386))

In gnu.misc.discuss Rjack <address@hidden> wrote:
> Alan Mackenzie wrote:

>> Hah!  If they were genuine GPL discussions, they might be on topic,
>>  but genuine they are not.  You post not to discuss, but to
>> disparage and libel.  And since when has this sort of stuff been
>> on-topic anywhere:

> Ha! I'm just emulating my favorite guy, Alan Mackenzie, who jumps over
> to Groklaw not to discuss, but to disparage and libel Terekhov behind
> his back. Seems to me what's sauce for the Goose is sauce for the
> Gander. No?

You just don't get it, do you?  Both you and he have spent several years
continually disparaging, perhaps even slandering, many people in the free
software field, including Richard Stallman and Eben Moglen.  That can
have a price.  What Alex T has now grasped is that slandering people and
things in the free software field isn't just a harmless game.  It damages
not only feelings, but reputations and even profits.  If he, for whatever
reason, becomes some sort of "quoted legal expert", his head is well
above the sandbags.

My post about AT was NOT "behind his back"; it was in a place where I
fully expected him to see it, which indeed he did.  It was not libel,
since it was not false.  Note that Alex posted it here on this mailing
list twice in full without passing any comment on it, or challenging
anything said in it.

> You don't believe in equal rights huh?

Oh, I do.  But I understand that with rights come responsibilities and
obligations.  I also believe in "equal responsibilities"; something which
probably is outside your comprehension.

>> ?  That's pure nastiness, pure bile from a gutless poster, Rjack, 
>> who probably wouldn't say boo to a goose if the goose could see him
>>  and sqwawk back.

> WRT Pammy Jo, what's sauce for the Goose is sauce for the Gander. No?

For the gander, yes, but not for the cockroach.

> Sincerely,
> Rjack

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]