gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen


From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen Talk
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:26:02 +0100

David Kastrup wrote:
> 
> Alexander Terekhov <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > David Kastrup wrote:
> > [...]
> >> > A compilation work which you call 'MacOSX' is a collective work (see
> >> > 17 USC 101 for both 'compilation' and 'collective work') of Apple and
> >> > only Apple, silly.
> >>
> >> Without any components with copyright by other parties?
> >
> > The copyright on components (distinct from the compilation work) is
> > totally separate/independent copyright (distinct from the copyright on
> > compilation) you retard dak.
> 
> So for any component with copyrighted parts from other parties (like
> BSD), Apple could not sue for breach of copyright without having the
> other parties joining the suit?
> 
> Reality check...

Apple's COMPILATION WORK is NOT A JOINT WORK you retard.

Apple took some BSD'd works and included that stuff in a compilation
work exclusively (C) by Apple and only Apple.

It's not a joint work under 17 USC 101.

regards,
alexander.

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]