[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:58:16 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
RJack <user@example.net> writes:
> On 8/8/2010 12:07 PM, ZnU wrote:
>>
>> Basically, to argue that the Jacobsen v. Katzer reasoning doesn't
>> apply to the GPL, you'd need to argue that there was some
>> _additional_ factor relevant to the GPL that somehow undermined its
>> use of the same language that was held to create a condition
>> precedent in Jacobsen. What might that factor be?
>>
>
> The Artistic License is not the General Public License.
>
> What you *will never admit to* is that the phrase "provided that"
> omits the preposition "before" as in "provided that before".
What you will never admit to is that judges have a brain rather than a
linguistic computing circuitry which will brown out according to your
fantastic theories shoestringed together along the lines of your wishful
thinking. Legal documents are not word games.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, (continued)
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, ZnU, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, ZnU, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, ZnU, 2010/12/08