|
From: | David Kastrup |
Subject: | Re: Utterly imbecile pinky communist Ninth Circuit 'judges' (Vernor scandalous ruling) |
Date: | Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:01:20 -0000 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes: > You idiot. > > Nothing you quoted suggests that CTA retained and used "upgrade" copies > (or sold them to someone else). And nothing I wrote suggests that either. Try focusing. The problem was that CTA sold the media for the _original_ versions after obtaining upgrades to them that were licensed under condition that the _original_ media were being destroyed. Now if CTA had acquired new full versions rather than upgrades, the case would have been different, and first sale rights would likely have applied. Certainly likely enough that Autodesk has been very careful to state the upgrade discount and its conditions and license agreements, and the court has been very careful to repeat them. This is very clearly very relevant to what the case is about. -- David Kastrup
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |