[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No to StowFS!
From: |
Alfred M\. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: No to StowFS! |
Date: |
Sun, 05 Feb 2006 21:13:13 +0100 |
How about a daemon (or service, or translator, or whatever) that
would monitor the "/Programs" directory where the new programs are
installed. And when that daemon sees a new program it automagicaly
does a "ln -s" for binaries, includes, libraries, etc.
That is exactly what stowfs does, only that the links in /bin don't
really exist, and are updated on the fly.
Re: No to StowFS!, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/03
- Re: No to StowFS!, Michael Heath, 2006/02/04
- Re: No to StowFS!, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/05
- Re: No to StowFS!, Filip Brcic, 2006/02/05
- Re: No to StowFS!, Gianluca Guida, 2006/02/05
- Re: No to StowFS!,
Alfred M\. Szmidt <=
- Re: No to StowFS!, Leonardo Pereira, 2006/02/05
- Re: No to StowFS!, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2006/02/05
- Re: No to StowFS!, Gianluca Guida, 2006/02/05
- Re: No to StowFS!, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/02/08
Re: No to StowFS!, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/02/09
Re: No to StowFS!, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/09
Re: No to StowFS!, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/09
Message not available