gnu-system-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GNU Mach


From: Marcus Brinkmann
Subject: Re: GNU Mach
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:15:23 +0200
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (Shijō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/23.0.0 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)

At Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:07:36 +0200,
<address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 12:54:17AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> 
> > People have mentioned several issues in GNU Mach (in particular, there
> > was one good summary by Olaf, but heck if I can find it in the
> > archive.  Do you guys never change the subject lines?)  But there was
> > at least one glaring omission, and one that is in my opinion Given the
> > Of course it is impossible to give a comprehensive review of all
> > issues, but at least this one deserves particular mention, because it
> > is so obvious.  If you ever did I/O-intensive work on the Hurd, you
> > know what I am talking about.
> > 
> > GNU Mach does not have any resource accounting, and it has very poor
> > resource scheduling.
> 
> Actually, I did mention it as the very first problem, though only in one
> sentence...
> 
> Anyways, thanks for the nice summary :-)
> 
> BTW, the message you were looking for is
> 
>    http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-system-discuss/2007-09/msg00071.html
> 
> Guess how I found it? By searching for "resource" :-)

Right.  That's the message.  It mentions resource accounting, but not
resource scheduling.

Thanks,
Marcus





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]