[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU Mach
From: |
Marcus Brinkmann |
Subject: |
Re: GNU Mach |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:15:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (Shijō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/23.0.0 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
At Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:07:36 +0200,
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 12:54:17AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> > People have mentioned several issues in GNU Mach (in particular, there
> > was one good summary by Olaf, but heck if I can find it in the
> > archive. Do you guys never change the subject lines?) But there was
> > at least one glaring omission, and one that is in my opinion Given the
> > Of course it is impossible to give a comprehensive review of all
> > issues, but at least this one deserves particular mention, because it
> > is so obvious. If you ever did I/O-intensive work on the Hurd, you
> > know what I am talking about.
> >
> > GNU Mach does not have any resource accounting, and it has very poor
> > resource scheduling.
>
> Actually, I did mention it as the very first problem, though only in one
> sentence...
>
> Anyways, thanks for the nice summary :-)
>
> BTW, the message you were looking for is
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-system-discuss/2007-09/msg00071.html
>
> Guess how I found it? By searching for "resource" :-)
Right. That's the message. It mentions resource accounting, but not
resource scheduling.
Thanks,
Marcus
- GNU Mach, Marcus Brinkmann, 2007/09/12
- Re: GNU Mach, olafBuddenhagen, 2007/09/13
- Re: GNU Mach,
Marcus Brinkmann <=