[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [open-cobol-list] OpenCOBOL release 1.0
|
From: |
David Essex |
|
Subject: |
Re: [open-cobol-list] OpenCOBOL release 1.0 |
|
Date: |
Sat, 29 Dec 2007 23:56:17 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020722 |
Tim Josling wrote:
> As for COBOL for GCC, I left my job recently and have been
> working full-time on COBOL for GCC since 3 December 2007.
> I plan to work on it for six months full-time.
>
> I have started from scratch again, and this time I am writing
> it mostly in Lisp. The GCC back end interface will be in C
> and so will the run-time routines that cannot be written in
> COBOL.
> ...
Given the advanced state of OC and your knowledge of the GCC
back-end, is there any particular reason why you choose not
to use OC ?
Message not available
Re: [open-cobol-list] OpenCOBOL release 1.0, Ben Duncan, 2007/12/29