|
From: | J Busser |
Subject: | demographics (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1) |
Date: | Tue, 22 Feb 2005 00:38:18 -0800 |
At 6:44 PM +1100 2/21/05, Ian Haywood wrote:
Can we identify what issues / needs demographics would have of the objects and again try to freeze or minimally disturb them except as demographics requires during its 0.1 construction?We've already been through this cycle once...
Ian,I was not looking to require anything in demographics to be re-done. I just wasn't sure of anything that was *yet* to be decided in order to permit demographics to be completed for 0.1 and to propose that
1) nothing *get* changed that would interfere with 0.1 demographics and2) people working on (or familiar with) demographics *identify* any issues not yet decided that ought to be in the classes or the schema etc
Can we assemble whatever is the to-do list and maybe move what is currently on the RoadMap page to a new page like PatientCreationAndModification- should Search be included here?- (I like Creation only because Input sounds like inviting what patient think, but I realize we are not really "Creating" patients so mine is a weak argument; it may be more understandable to users if there is value in a shared vocabulary
Unfortunately Jim, I'm basically finishing off this area of functionality: it's just too late to be discussing design.
I was just asking about putting into greater detail on the **wiki ** any to-dos to get demographics 0.1 done. As the wiki is having some problems saving pages, especially complex pages, it seemed a reasonable idea (in place of *adding* the extra detail to the roadmap page) to move the linked info about patient demographics to its own page
I wasn't presuming either a personal need or entitlement to ask any big changes to the demographics design.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |