[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention)
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention) |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Sep 2009 23:17:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:34:50PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> But I left all the documenting comments in the used config files.
> So what?
Then it shouldn't be necessary.
> > > > mime_type2file_extension.conf.example ?
> Well, *if* there is any GNUmed specific mapping I would really happy
> about such a mime file. But providing an example for for something
> which is well known and installed on any default Linux system makes no
> sense at all if it is not GNUmed specific.
Can you point me to the Debian file which maps mimetypes to
file extensions ?
Oh, wait, there is /etc/mime.types.
Hm, it doesn't have image/x-bmp ...
Let's look at mime_type2file_extension.conf ...
Ha ! There it is !
Andreas, this file is there for a reason - it maps x-bmp to
.bmp which otherwise won't always work on Debian.
> > But it could be an .example in
> > doc/gnumed-client/
>
> So again - please provide a GNUmed typical example to make any sense
> of it.
There is one example right in the file.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Naming convention (Was: Choice of programming language and project management), (continued)
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Naming convention (Was: Choice of programming language and project management), Andreas Tille, 2009/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Naming convention (Was: Choice of programming language and project management), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/07
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Naming convention (Was: Choice of programming language and project management), Jim Busser, 2009/09/08
- [Gnumed-devel] Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/07
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/08
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Andreas Tille, 2009/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/08
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Andreas Tille, 2009/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention),
Karsten Hilbert <=
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Andreas Tille, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/09
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Andreas Tille, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/13
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/08