[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Turtorials
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Turtorials |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Jul 2010 23:30:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 08:14:54AM -0700, Jim Busser wrote:
> The "Notes" plugin's multi-notelet support enables problem
> components to be split across the EMR tree's various
> problems. Liz maybe points to this as impractical, at least
> for some patient populations.
That's true, no doubt.
> The implication is that it is
> maybe only practical to generate a single, large SOAP note
> for any one encounter.
No, the implication would be that there very likely are
encounters in which it is more practical to write a single,
large SOAP note.
Which can already be done.
> But we have no easy way to "tag"
> multiple problems against a single note.
Because, logically, that doesn't make sense.
> Maybe *begin* the encounter in a single new notelet but --
> before saving -- making a decision as to whether and which
> parts of the SOAP text (snippets) to move into notelets
> easily raised from among the existing problems.
I have been thinking about this quite often and (I think)
have also written about it once before on this list - maybe
coming from a different angle, namely a tool for
facilitating sorting Subjective and Objective into
differential diagnosis considerations.
> Perhaps (IMO) even if all of the {Subjective, Objective}
> were allowed to remain in a single note, there would remain
> value to capturing *some* component Assessment and Plan
> items inside their respective problems?
Which can also already be done.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
[Gnumed-devel] chronic vs acute, was: Turtorials, Karsten Hilbert, 2010/07/04
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Turtorials, Karsten Hilbert, 2010/07/04