Re: [gnutls-dev] Re: alternative /dev/random

[Andreas Metzler]

On 2006-03-13 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <address@hidden> wrote:
[...]
> Ok, I got a bit partial here. I don't consider the concepts of
> /dev/random and /dev/urandom to be that bad for a prng generator
> (although it is not that good either) and it was initially
> revolutionary --I knew of no others system support such concept.
> What I consider bad is the unwilliness of the maintainers to
> consider alternative approaches given the weaknesses that have been
> found so far.
[...]

Hello,
Could you elaborate on which weaknesses you are talking about? (Just
to satisfy my curiosity.)
thanks, cu andreas
-- 
The 'Galactic Cleaning' policy undertaken by Emperor Zhark is a personal
vision of the emperor's, and its inclusion in this work does not constitute
tacit approval by the author or the publisher for any such projects,
howsoever undertaken.                                (c) Jasper Ffforde