Re: SCM_CALL_N

[Neil Jerram]

>>>>> "Keisuke" == Keisuke Nishida <address@hidden> writes:

    Keisuke> Hello, The patch attached below implements four macros,
    Keisuke> SCM_CALL_0, SCM_CALL_1, SCM_CALL_2, and SCM_CALL_3, as
    Keisuke> follows: [...]

    Keisuke> Is this a good patch?  Can I apply it?

I'm inclined against it.  The benefit does not seem sufficient to
outweigh the cost, which is to obscure calls of scm_apply.

Instead, some of the cases that you suggest changing could be tidied
up a bit by using the appropriate SCM_LISTn macro.

        Neil