[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: continuation efficiency
From: |
Klaus Schilling |
Subject: |
Re: continuation efficiency |
Date: |
Sun, 8 Jul 2001 21:47:24 +0200 |
Thomas Bushnell, BSG writes:
>
> 1) In guile, call/ec might be a primitive, but in fact is not.
> 2) In guile, call/ec is faster than call/cc.
call/ec could be implemented from different primitives that don't
have anything in common with call/cc. no logical problem at all.
Klaus Schilling
- Re: continuation efficiency, (continued)
- Re: continuation efficiency, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/07/08
- Re: continuation efficiency, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/08
- Re: continuation efficiency, Marius Vollmer, 2001/07/07
- Re: continuation efficiency, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/07
- Re: continuation efficiency, Marius Vollmer, 2001/07/07
- Re: continuation efficiency, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/08
- Re: continuation efficiency, Marius Vollmer, 2001/07/08
- Re: continuation efficiency,
Klaus Schilling <=
Re: continuation efficiency, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/06
- Re: continuation efficiency, Marius Vollmer, 2001/07/07
- Re: continuation efficiency, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/08
- Re: continuation efficiency, Rob Browning, 2001/07/08
- Re: continuation efficiency, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/08
- Re: continuation efficiency, Marius Vollmer, 2001/07/09
- Re: continuation efficiency, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/09
- Re: continuation efficiency, Rob Browning, 2001/07/10
- Re: continuation efficiency, Dale P. Smith, 2001/07/10
- Re: continuation efficiency, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/10