[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: JACAL, scm
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: JACAL, scm |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Sep 2001 17:41:33 -0700 (PDT) |
rlb:
One point I was trying to make is that not everyone here is all that
aware of the history. Without that background, their reactions to
your assertions are likely to be different.
tom:
> Now you are aware. Instead of dwelling on why the error was
> committed, why not consider how best to fix it?
rlb:
Tom, you really don't seem very interested in an actual
discussion
You don't seem very interested in the points I've asked the
maintainers to consider, such as clean interoperability with other GNU
software and the relation of my ()/#f proposal to the history of
Scheme and commonly adopted practices for writing portable Scheme
code.
Instead, you have speculated on non-technical issues and drawn
ridiculous and unsupported conclusions about my motivations.
Which of us isn't very interested in "actual discussion"?
-t
- Re: JACAL, scm, (continued)
- Re: JACAL, scm, Tom Lord, 2001/09/25
- Re: JACAL, scm, Bill Gribble, 2001/09/25
- Re: JACAL, scm, Tom Lord, 2001/09/25
- Re: JACAL, scm, Bill Gribble, 2001/09/25
- Re: JACAL, scm, Tom Lord, 2001/09/25
- Re: JACAL, scm, Rob Browning, 2001/09/25
- Re: JACAL, scm, Tom Lord, 2001/09/25
- Re: JACAL, scm, Rob Browning, 2001/09/25
- Re: JACAL, scm, Tom Lord, 2001/09/25
- Re: JACAL, scm, Rob Browning, 2001/09/25
- Re: JACAL, scm,
Tom Lord <=
- Re: JACAL, scm, Rob Browning, 2001/09/25
- Re: JACAL, scm, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/09/25
- Re: JACAL, scm, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/09/26
- Re: JACAL, scm, Masao Uebayashi, 2001/09/25
- Re: JACAL, scm, Michael Livshin, 2001/09/25
- Re: JACAL, scm, Miroslav Silovic, 2001/09/26
- #f and '() (was: Re: JACAL, scm), Jorgen 'forcer' Schaefer, 2001/09/25
- Re: #f and '() (was: Re: JACAL, scm), Tom Lord, 2001/09/25
- Re: JACAL, scm, Maciej Stachowiak, 2001/09/25
- Re: JACAL, scm, Tom Lord, 2001/09/25