[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16)
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
Subject: |
Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16) |
Date: |
28 May 2002 19:53:56 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
address@hidden writes:
> Ups, ... so you are saying that i have to check each file of the guile
> core distribution to see if i can use it for my needs/together/linked into
> my software?
If you want to be really sure, yes. However, we of course intend to
license all of the Guile core with GPL-exception, and people should be
able find this out without having to scan each file.
I agree that having the exception in README and the manual might not
be obvious enough. The LICENSE file idea looks very reasonable.
> Thanks for pointing this out to me. I allway assumed that there's
> _one_ licence for guile (why then all that hassle with the readline
> libs?).
There is one license (GPL+exception) for all of libguile, but not all
files necessarily use GPL+exception. For example, the support tools
like guile-snarf might use the full GPL (without affecting the license
of libguile).
- Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16), (continued)
- Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16), Rob Browning, 2002/05/28
- Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16), Marius Vollmer, 2002/05/28
- Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16), Marius Vollmer, 2002/05/28
- Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16), Rob Browning, 2002/05/28
- Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16), Marius Vollmer, 2002/05/28
- Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16), Rob Browning, 2002/05/30
- Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16), Marius Vollmer, 2002/05/30
- Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16), rm, 2002/05/30
- Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16), Rob Browning, 2002/05/30
- Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16), Marius Vollmer, 2002/05/30
- Re: Release status 1.6.1 (2002-05-16),
Marius Vollmer <=