Re: memoization and conditional defines

[Marius Vollmer]

Dirk Herrmann <address@hidden> writes:

> I would again like to put your focus on the question, whether we should
> support top level forms like the following:
> 
>   (if <condition> (define foo bar))

I'd say that we might want to allow this, but don't try to make it
behave especially nice.  We should provide a better alternative,
however: Conditional 'defines' should be decided at compile time, not
at run-time.  We might extend 'cond-expand' to allow running arbitrary
code, or something in that direction.

-- 
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3  331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405