Re: No way out.

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

Neil Jerram wrote:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> writes:
>
>
> > Backtraces haven't been appearing since I started using 1.7, for over a year
>
>
> Because of my interest in Guile's debugging infrastructure, I'd like
> to understand and fix this.  Your statement is a bit vague, though,
> unless you mean _only_ the following.
>
>
> > See also,
> >
> >  http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2005-05/msg00010.html
>
>
> As http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2005-05/msg00019.html
> already asked (and to which there appears to be no reply), were you
> running with the debugging evaluator (in other words (debug-enable
> 'debug))?  If not, does it help to say (debug-enable 'debug) as well
> as (debug-enable 'backtrace)?

No it doesn't.    I have


;;; General settings
;;; debugging evaluator is slower.  This should
;;; have a more sensible default.

(if (ly:get-option 'verbose)
    (begin
      (debug-enable 'debug)
      (debug-enable 'backtrace)
      (read-enable 'positions)))

near the top of the first .scm file, but lilypond --verbose doesn't 
produce any backtraces.

If you intend to look at this, then I can try to isolate it to a smaller 
  case.

--
 Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen