[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Backtrace and enhanced catch

From: Marius Vollmer
Subject: Re: Backtrace and enhanced catch
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 23:34:51 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

>> Hmm, what I'm trying to say here that "lazy" is not some standard,
>> established terminology, and if we come up with something better, we
>> should feel free to change terminology.
> Yes, that makes good sense.  I can't think of anything better than
> "pre-unwind", so I'll use that in all new names.  I don't think it's
> worth changing any preexisting names though, such as struct lazy_catch
> - do you agree?

I agree.

> [...], so long as we don't have to worry about preserving source
> compatibility for functions that have SCM_API but are not part of
> the Guile API.  And my understanding is that "part of the Guile API"
> <=> "documented in the manual".

Yes, exactly.

GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3  331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]