[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add slurm.
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add slurm. |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Feb 2016 16:43:38 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 10:32:01PM +0100, Pjotr Prins wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 03:38:46PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> > I wonder if the version of git is a factor? 2.1.4 vs 2.6.3. Jan was also
> > using 2.1.4, and his patches also failed *only* on the attribution line.
>
> Thank you Leo and Andreas for restoring my sanity!
>
> I'll upgrade git. I was using the newer version in my build
> environment but generating the patch in an older version. Also locales
> I need to settle on. I tend to have en_GB on Debian, but in a guix
> shell it may act strange if I don't specify locales.
>
> And I won't add attribution again ;). I.e., the combination of being
> an old git, having wrong locales and injecting self-attribution, was
> lethal.
Does this mean the old version of git doesn't generate patches with the
correct locale?
I wonder... where is everyone getting git 2.1.4 from? It's 2 years old
;)
>
> Pj.
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add slurm., (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add slurm., Andreas Enge, 2016/02/13
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add slurm., Leo Famulari, 2016/02/13
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add slurm., Andreas Enge, 2016/02/14
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add slurm., Leo Famulari, 2016/02/14
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add slurm., Pjotr Prins, 2016/02/15
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add slurm., Andreas Enge, 2016/02/15
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add slurm., Pjotr Prins, 2016/02/16
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add slurm., Andreas Enge, 2016/02/16
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add slurm., Leo Famulari, 2016/02/13
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add slurm., Pjotr Prins, 2016/02/13
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add slurm.,
Leo Famulari <=
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add slurm., Pjotr Prins, 2016/02/13
Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add slurm-llnl., Eric Bavier, 2016/02/10
Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add slurm-llnl., Efraim Flashner, 2016/02/11