[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal: Prefix language-name for language library packages
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
Re: Proposal: Prefix language-name for language library packages |
Date: |
Mon, 2 May 2016 14:33:34 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 09:50:43AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> FWIW, until recently Nixpkgs didn’t use multiple outputs much (info
> "(guix) Packages with Multiple Outputs"). Lately they merged a change
> to use them very aggressively. So for instance, GNU libidn, which takes
> 800 KiB in total, has no less than 5 outputs:
>
>
> https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/development/libraries/libidn/default.nix
>
> I think this is going a bit too far. :-)
I agree. The time spent by humans figuring out which output to use will
probably never be "earned back" by the bandwidth and disk savings in
that case.
> I think the approach should be to profile packages with ‘guix size’ and
> to act mostly on a case-by-case basis.
Case-by-case, as with most things!