[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gzz] Re: Available overlays PEG
From: |
Tuomas Lukka |
Subject: |
Re: [Gzz] Re: Available overlays PEG |
Date: |
Sat, 2 Aug 2003 12:29:02 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 11:24:55AM +0200, Benja Fallenstein wrote:
> Tuomas Lukka wrote:
> >>OpenGL is different because it implements a completely different
> >>interface than AWT offering different capabilities &c. This is more like
> >>deciding in Kaffe which implementation of AWT (X-based? QT-based?
> >>win32-based?) is default.
> >
> >And tapestry provides DOLR, not DHT. Thus it *is* analogous.
>
> We'll use it to implement exactly the same functions as before, which
> includes using a DHT layer built on top of it. If we couldn't do that,
> we probably couldn't use Tapestry.
Ok. But I still see it as a part of architecture -- probably just
because we define architecture differently ;)
Tuomas
- [Gzz] Re: Available overlays PEG, Hermanni Hyytiälä, 2003/08/01
- Re: [Gzz] Re: Available overlays PEG, Tuomas Lukka, 2003/08/02
- Re: [Gzz] Re: Available overlays PEG, Benja Fallenstein, 2003/08/02
- Re: [Gzz] Re: Available overlays PEG, Tuomas Lukka, 2003/08/02
- Re: [Gzz] Re: Available overlays PEG, Benja Fallenstein, 2003/08/02
- Re: [Gzz] Re: Available overlays PEG,
Tuomas Lukka <=
- Re: [Gzz] Re: Available overlays PEG, hemppah, 2003/08/04
- Re: [Gzz] Re: Available overlays PEG, Tuomas Lukka, 2003/08/04
- Re: [Gzz] Re: Available overlays PEG, hemppah, 2003/08/04