RE: Parser called from lexer

[REFSTRUP,JACOB (HP-Vancouver,ex1)]

I agree that we should have a common extension for skeletons and .bison
seems like a good choice. In naming it bison.async I was just sticking to
the naming convention in bison 1.35.

- Jacob

-----Original Message-----
From: Hans Aberg [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 2:25 AM
To: address@hidden
Subject: RE: Parser called from lexer


At 16:08 -0700 2002/06/18, REFSTRUP,JACOB (HP-Vancouver,ex1) wrote:
>I've hacked together a bison skeleton

My guess is that this should be on the Bug Bison <address@hidden> list.

> (async.bison) that...

>... is very similar to bison.simple as it is
>based on that file. With a little bit of effort bison.simple and
bison.async
>could be combined.

I think you should agree to a common suffix for the Bison skeleton files,
as the suffix is used by OS's to identify the type or contents type of a
file. -- I suggest that "bison" should be the suffix.

  Hans Aberg



_______________________________________________
address@hidden http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison