[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Eliminating conflicts of parenthesized subexpressions
From: |
Hans Aberg |
Subject: |
Re: Eliminating conflicts of parenthesized subexpressions |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:11:23 +0200 |
At 10:56 +0200 2004/09/13, Akim Demaille wrote:
> > I am inclined at following this line, to sort it out by action typing. This
> > makes the grammar simple. But it is not clear to me why it necessarily
> > should be viewed as semantic. One can think of grammars beyond the capacity
> > of Bison. The choice is merely dictated by practical concerns.
>
>Semantic analysis is always due to the limited capacity of parsers.
>Type-checking and other context depend analysis are 100% a matter of
>_context dependent_ syntax.
>
>But these grammars are a problem to handle (and to understand!).
>That's why we do CFG and have other passes afterwards. Indeed, "The
>choice is merely *always* dictated by practical concerns."
Thanks for the input. It is pretty much the picture I have in my mind.
Hans Aberg
- Eliminating conflicts of parenthesized subexpressions, Hans Aberg, 2004/09/09
- Re: Eliminating conflicts of parenthesized subexpressions, Vincent Zweije, 2004/09/09
- Re: Eliminating conflicts of parenthesized subexpressions, Hans Aberg, 2004/09/09
- Re: Eliminating conflicts of parenthesized subexpressions, Akim Demaille, 2004/09/13
- Re: Eliminating conflicts of parenthesized subexpressions, Hans Aberg, 2004/09/13
- Re: Eliminating conflicts of parenthesized subexpressions, Akim Demaille, 2004/09/14
- Re: Eliminating conflicts of parenthesized subexpressions, Hans Aberg, 2004/09/14
- Re: Eliminating conflicts of parenthesized subexpressions, Akim Demaille, 2004/09/14
- Re: Eliminating conflicts of parenthesized subexpressions, Hans Aberg, 2004/09/15
- Re: Eliminating conflicts of parenthesized subexpressions, Akim Demaille, 2004/09/16
- Re: Eliminating conflicts of parenthesized subexpressions, Hans Aberg, 2004/09/16