[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [h-e-w] Re: Gnus, anyone?

From: Robert Praetorius
Subject: Re: [h-e-w] Re: Gnus, anyone?
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 09:31:03 +1100

>  From what I've heard, the mutt included with cygwin is not the most 
> up-to-date or complete.

     Since I follow (well, receive and skim) the cygwin mailing list and was 
the one 
casting indirect aspersions at mutt on cygwin and am both a cygwin and a mutt 
user. . .

        the current beta mutt is 1.3.24 (see ).
        People report being able to build this on cygwin and it running
        well, but I recall people saying it can't be built OOTB

        the current cygwin distribution (see ) has both mutt-1.2.5i-5 and
        mutt-1.2.5i-6 (not sure what the differences are)

        the cygwin mailing list archives (see )
        contain numerous comments, many commenting on problems with
        binary attachments and whether they are or aren't solved by
        this or that.

p.s.:  does anybody else remember Emacs' ancestor, ^R mode?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]