help-gnats
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: faking an append-only field


From: Mike Hoolehan
Subject: Re: faking an append-only field
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 15:29:58 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

Perfect!  Thanks, that was a good idea.  For anyone else interested then,
the following changes to a dbconfig file will make a nice bugzilla-ish 
appending audit trail.

First, set the Audit-Trail field to read-only.  Then add this:

field "Add-To-Audit-Trail" {
   description "Add a log entry to Audit Trail"
   multitext { default "\n" }
   on-change  {
        add-audit-trail
        audit-trail-format {
        format "---- Comments by %s on %s ----\n %s\n\n" #whatever you like
        fields { "$EditUserEmailAddr" "$CurrentDate" "$NewValue" }
        }
    }
    on-change {
        set-field "Add-To-Audit-Trail" { "\n" }
    }
}

Mike


On (01/08/02 11:54), Dirk Bergstrom wrote:
> On 8/1/2002 11:27 AM, Mike Hoolehan expounded at length upon:
> > With the gnats 4 beta, I'm attempting to mimic the audit trail behavior I'm
> > used to in bugzilla (basically an append-only field).  Here's my attempt,
> > that works mostly:
> > field "Add-To-Audit-Trail" {
> [snip]
> > }   
> > Then I just made the original Audit-Trail field 'read-only'.   
> 
> man, that's pretty slick!
> 
> > This strategy works correctly except after the PR has just been created 
> > and the PR is edited the first time.  Even if the user doesn't change the 
> > "Add-To-Audit-Trail" field on the gnatsweb interface, the on-change 
> > stuff is being run.  I've experimented with conditional 'on-change' using
> > regexes, but nothing seemed to help.  
> 
> i'm pretty sure that the problem arises because add-to-audit-trail is
> not actually in the PR after it's created (ie. it's not an initial-entry
> field).  this means that after the first edit, the value in the field
> has "changed", because it's gone from the empty string to a single
> newline (or something like that).
> 
> you might be able to fix this by setting a default value of " " for the
> field, or whatever value gnatsweb seems to be sticking in there.  adding
> it to the initial-entry list might also solve the problem, but that's an
> ugly fix.
> 
> hope this helps.
> 
> -- 
> Dirk Bergstrom                   address@hidden
> Computer Geek                     v: 707.433.0564
> Juniper Networks Inc.             f: 707.433.0769
> 
> "it *looks* like a nail; lemme grab my hammer..."
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Help-gnats mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnats



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]