[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: w3 under development or not?
From: |
Friedrich Dominicus |
Subject: |
Re: w3 under development or not? |
Date: |
13 Nov 2003 16:10:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Native Windows TTY Support) |
bkhl@elektrubadur.se (Björn Lindström) writes:
> That's a problem with Emacs not being multi-threaded, rather than
> w3. You can expect this kind of behaviour to disappear some time after
> Emacs has finally been ported to Guile.
you expect an Emacs guile? See you in the next century :)
It's varpoware at it's worst.
Regards
Friedrich
- w3 under development or not?, Joe Corneli, 2003/11/10
- Re: w3 under development or not?,
Friedrich Dominicus <=
- Re: w3 under development or not?, Shane, 2003/11/14
- Poppong mail (Re: w3 under development or not?), Gian Uberto Lauri, 2003/11/14
- Re: w3 under development or not?, Peter Lee, 2003/11/14
- Re: w3 under development or not?, Ted Zlatanov, 2003/11/14
- Re: w3 under development or not?, Peter Lee, 2003/11/14
- Re: w3 under development or not?, Ted Zlatanov, 2003/11/14
- Re: w3 under development or not?, Peter Lee, 2003/11/14
- Re: w3 under development or not?, Juri Linkov, 2003/11/15
- Re: w3 under development or not?, Ted Zlatanov, 2003/11/15
- Re: w3 under development or not?, Alan Mackenzie, 2003/11/17