[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lazy-lock vs. jit-lock
From: |
Ian Zimmerman |
Subject: |
Re: lazy-lock vs. jit-lock |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:20:11 -0500 |
On 12/29/05, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
> If those parts are displayed and yet they're not fontified it's a bug which
> you should report via M-x report-emacs-bug.
This is the case. I'll do a bug report ... but this involves my own mode
and a not exactly mainstream language, so I wonder how far it will get me.
The fact that jit-lock interacts with Emacs C code is not encouraging,
I fear I will be asked to gdb Emacs which I won't.
> Lazy-lock has some known bugs (I remember some missing on-screen
> fontification using outline-minor-mode, for example), >is less efficient<
Can you expand on the last point? What makes lazy-lock less efficient?
--
"Political systems do not deal easily
with long term threats,
even if they have a probability of 100%"
James Schlesinger, a former director of the CIA