[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?
From: |
Joost Kremers |
Subject: |
Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question? |
Date: |
8 Feb 2007 23:56:45 GMT |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.8.1 (Linux) |
Pascal Bourguignon wrote:
> The web was designed for emacs, originally! w3m would have no
> difficulty in rendering web pages written in 1994. It's later
> botching of the web that loses.
well, just so long as it is clear where the design fault lies. ;-)
--
Joost Kremers joostkremers@yahoo.com
Selbst in die Unterwelt dringt durch Spalten Licht
EN:SiS(9)
- Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, (continued)
Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, mkeller, 2007/02/10
Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, Tom Rauchenwald, 2007/02/10
Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, Tyler Smith, 2007/02/08
Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, Pascal Bourguignon, 2007/02/08
- Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, thorne, 2007/02/08
- Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, Joost Kremers, 2007/02/08
- Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, Pascal Bourguignon, 2007/02/08
- Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?,
Joost Kremers <=
- Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, Tim X, 2007/02/11
- Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, William Case, 2007/02/11
- Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, William Case, 2007/02/11
- Message not available
- Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, Tim X, 2007/02/11
Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, Tim X, 2007/02/11
Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, Hadron, 2007/02/08
Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, Robert D. Crawford, 2007/02/08
Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, Rjjd, 2007/02/08
Re: OT -- An extremely dumb curiosity question?, Robert Thorpe, 2007/02/09