[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations |
Date: |
Sun, 01 Dec 2013 21:57:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) |
Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com> writes:
> These are the lists that I read
>
> 0: nntp+news.gmane.org:gmane.emacs.sources
> 0: nntp+news.gmane.org:gmane.emacs.devel
> 0: nntp+news.gmane.org:gmane.emacs.announce
> 0: nntp+news.gmane.org:gmane.emacs.cedet
> 0: nntp+news.gmane.org:gmane.emacs.gnus.user
> 0: nntp+news.gmane.org:gmane.emacs.orgmode
> 0: nntp+news.gmane.org:gmane.emacs.bugs
> 0: nntp+news.gmane.org:gmane.emacs.help
Now I'm on gmane as well. Yeah, it was only a matter of
chaining -
;; (setq gnus-select-method '(nntp "Aioe.org"))
(setq gnus-select-method '(nntp "news.gmane.org"))
- and this is the same as gnu.emacs.help, only... I
only see *some* of my messages - on the other hand, if
Jambunathan has been on gmane all the while, it must
still work somehow, because he has answered those that
I do not see. (?)
Well, this is all a bit confusing. I don't know if I
should change. Because, just as I couldn't get to gmane
from Aioe, all those other newsgroups, for example
comp.unix.misc (*)
comp.unix.programmer (*)
comp.unix.shell (*)
are now unavailable.
Could you make a case that gmane is better than Aioe?
--
Emanuel Berg, programmer-for-rent. CV, projects, etc at uXu
underground experts united: http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/01
Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/01