[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug in $(call ...) ?
From: |
Paul D. Smith |
Subject: |
Re: Bug in $(call ...) ? |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Dec 2004 16:24:21 -0500 |
%% Boris Kolpackov <address@hidden> writes:
bk> True. My original suggestion (to temporarily change simple mode
bk> to recursive mode inside func_call() ) won't work for the following
bk> case:
Yes, that's not good enough. You'd need an entire mode where all
evaluations, even of simply expanded variables, in that context were
checked.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Smith <address@hidden> Find some GNU make tips at:
http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org
"Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist
- Re: Bug in $(call ...) ?, (continued)
- Re: Bug in $(call ...) ?, Boris Kolpackov, 2004/12/20
- Re: Bug in $(call ...) ?, Paul D. Smith, 2004/12/20
- Re: Bug in $(call ...) ?, Alexey Neyman, 2004/12/21
- Re: Bug in $(call ...) ?, Boris Kolpackov, 2004/12/21
- Re: Bug in $(call ...) ?, Paul D. Smith, 2004/12/21
- Re: Bug in $(call ...) ?, Boris Kolpackov, 2004/12/21
- Re: Bug in $(call ...) ?,
Paul D. Smith <=