|
From: | Scott Lamb |
Subject: | Re: gcc | Octave 2.1.4x | saga continues |
Date: | Sat, 15 Feb 2003 11:24:16 -0600 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020826 |
Evan Cooch wrote:
At 11:36 AM 2/14/2003 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:> Sigh - another 'my distro is better than your distro' tangent. Who cares -Nonsense. You started it, continued to cite specific shortcomings of RH,also bashed SuSE and then threw Debian into the same boat. Which is wrong,especially in light of the context you provided.Whatever. As if I/we'd expect objectivity from someone who is emailing from 'debian.org'.
Thank you. My roommate needs examples of logical fallacies for a class. The ad hominem (<http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/ad-hominem.html>) you have thoughtfully provided will do nicely.
In fact, this email was even worth interrupting the RedHat 8.0 install I'm doing on the other machine in this room.
My roommate has enough examples now, though, so you can stop. Thanks, Scott Lamb ------------------------------------------------------------- Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL. Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html -------------------------------------------------------------
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |