[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure
From: |
Dmitri A. Sergatskov |
Subject: |
Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure |
Date: |
Mon, 12 May 2008 12:31:22 -0500 |
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Labitt, Bruce
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> I think I may not have compiled ATLAS and LAPACK with 64 bit. I'll
> check on that. My version of gcc is 4.1.2 (Red Hat 4.1.2-14)
Re-compiling Lapack (and Blas/Atlas) as a 64-bit binary may not be sufficient.
As far as I understand, due to its Fortran legacy, the array indexes
set to INTEGER*8.
You need it to be INTEGER*16. Simple find-and-replace will most likely
break some code written with sizeof(int) == 32 assumption.
There are proprietary versuions of lapack/blas libraries (e.g. Intel's MKL )
that (I think) have this fixed, but i have no experience with those...
>
> GNUPLOT Version 4.0 patchlevel 0 was the binary I installed. I can
> uninstall it and compile 4.2.3 if it will matter...
You may have multiple gnuplots installed.
You need to set gnuplot_binary() (probably in your
.octaverc) to point to the gnuplot you want.
And yes, 4.2.3 is recommended.
>
> Thanks,
> Bruce
>
Sincerely,
Dmitri.
--
- Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Labitt, Bruce, 2008/05/08
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2008/05/08
- RE: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Labitt, Bruce, 2008/05/08
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2008/05/08
- RE: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Labitt, Bruce, 2008/05/08
- RE: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Labitt, Bruce, 2008/05/09
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2008/05/09
- RE: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Labitt, Bruce, 2008/05/12
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure,
Dmitri A. Sergatskov <=
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Sergei Steshenko, 2008/05/12
Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2008/05/08
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, David Bateman, 2008/05/08
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Francesco Potorti`, 2008/05/08
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, John W. Eaton, 2008/05/08
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Sergei Steshenko, 2008/05/09
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, John W. Eaton, 2008/05/09
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Sergei Steshenko, 2008/05/09
Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2008/05/08
Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Przemek Klosowski, 2008/05/09