[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: oct (and mex) files for different architectures

From: Richard Crozier
Subject: Re: oct (and mex) files for different architectures
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 16:25:02 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv: Gecko/20100713 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.1

 On 12/09/2011 15:35, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> 2011/9/12 Richard Crozier <address@hidden>:
>> OK, but won't the main difference in performance be the difference
>> between code compiler optimised for 64bit and 32 bit? I would actually
>> like to know this.
> I find it not a good idea to encode too much information in the
> filename extension (that's how those mypic.jpg.exe trojans spread back
> then, perhaps still do). That information as to what executable format
> the file is in can be best obtained from reading the file itself, e.g.
> by running file(1) on the file.
> - Jordi G. H.

Ok, I'll maybe just consider creating one directory for binaries for
each platform and move all that platform's binaries in there after

It'll be a bit of extra work to get everything working automatically,
but I suppose that's just the way it is.


The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]