Re: [Help-source-highlight] QSource-Highlight 0.2

[Lorenzo Bettini]

Matthias Pospiech wrote:
> Lorenzo Bettini schrieb:
> > Matthias Pospiech wrote:
> > > Lorenzo Bettini schrieb:
> > > > actually they're both platform independent; it's true that they rely 
> > > > on a unix-like system for building, but in windows you have both 
> > > > cygwin and mingw/msys for that.  Indeed there's a windows build of 
> > > > source-highlight that I did with mingw: 
> > > > http://www.lorenzobettini.it/software/source-highlight/
> > > Actually I want to build it on my own. I need a mingw build 
> > > compatible with the mingw Version of Qt 4.5 and a Visual Studio build 
> > > for Version 2005, 2008 and soon 2010.
> > >
> > > So what I really need is a solution to build the libary on windows on 
> > > my own.
> > > What I do not understand in the first place is how I run the 
> > > configure script without sh.
> >
> > Hi Matthias
> >
> > if you want to build it yourself then you also need a shell to run 
> > configure, and if you use mingw you'd need msys (which provides a 
> > shell and other tools); but to build source-highlight you also need 
> > the boost library for mingw.
> >
> > Thus, if you haven't already setup such an environment mingw/msys it 
> > might take some time.
> I was trying to set up a system with msys, but did not have success so 
> far. However what bothers me most is the compilation with msvc.
> The only build step I could find is this one: 
> http://folti.blogs.balabit.com/2009/08/compiling-autoconfmake-using-sources.html 
>
> which is really a way to fight around all problems of autoconf on 
> non.unix platform issues and not a clean solution.
>
> I wonder how difficult building of source-highlight really is. I think 
> putting all cpp+h files in a qmake project costs me only a few minutes. 
> Only the boost libary might be a problem since it does not build as a 
> shared libary on mingw.

Hi Matthias

probably I missed something: do you use mingw or msvc?  As for msvc I 
cannot tell, since I basically don't use those build tools.

As for boost, why do you actually need a dll?  can't you just use a 
static build of boost, like the one I inserted in the archive?

Have you tried to use the binary archive I told you about yesterday?
http://gdn.dsi.unifi.it/~bettini/binaries/source-highlight-qt-win32-0.2.tar.gz

If you need a version which is compatible with mingw and qt, then this 
version should do, since those are the tools I've built them with.

As for using qmake for source-highlight (and most importantly 
source-highlight-qt) it's a good idea.  Note that I'm not willing to 
abandon autotools, but I think I can also provide the .pro files to be 
able to build them with qmake.  Note that in that case it would only be 
a build of the library and binary and not of the documentation and 
related stuff.

hope to hear from you soon

cheers
        Lorenzo

--
Lorenzo Bettini, PhD in Computer Science, DI, Univ. Torino
ICQ# lbetto, 16080134     (GNU/Linux User # 158233)
HOME: http://www.lorenzobettini.it MUSIC: http://www.purplesucker.com
http://www.myspace.com/supertrouperabba
BLOGS: http://tronprog.blogspot.com  http://longlivemusic.blogspot.com
http://www.gnu.org/software/src-highlite
http://www.gnu.org/software/gengetopt
http://www.gnu.org/software/gengen http://doublecpp.sourceforge.net