[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The idea of an own L4
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: The idea of an own L4 |
Date: |
Sun, 09 Oct 2005 13:16:14 -0400 |
On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 18:48 +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> Surely Hurd has been delayed long enough? In order to have social
> impact with Hurd, Hurd has to ship. Soon.
>
> I think you are confusing the Hurd with the Hurd on L4. One could
> make a 0.3 release tomorrow of the Hurd, where for the Hurd on L4 it
> wouldn't make sense since it isn't near usable.
I apologize. You are entirely correct.
However, it appears to me that the future of Hurd lies with l4-hurd.
Arhcitectural changes are happening in Hurd, and as this occurs the
exisiting Hurd system will become progressively less important.
As an outsider, I do not hear people talking about "original hurd" much.
Perhaps I am listening in the wrong places. The successor has a good
chance at greater impact.
shap
- Re: The idea of an own L4, (continued)
- Re: The idea of an own L4, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/09
- Re: The idea of an own L4, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/09
- Re: The idea of an own L4, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/10
- Re: The idea of an own L4, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/10/11
- Re: The idea of an own L4, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/11
- Re: The idea of an own L4, ams, 2005/10/11
- Re: The idea of an own L4, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/11
- Re: The idea of an own L4, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/11