[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Persistance (was: Re: The idea of an own L4)

From: Jonathan S. Shapiro
Subject: Re: Persistance (was: Re: The idea of an own L4)
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 04:56:14 -0400

On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 05:29 +0200, address@hidden wrote:
> Hi,
> > Also, kernel object management is pretty important to me, if we want
> > at least orthogonal persistence.
> "At least"?...
> Unless I'm missing something very crucial, unless I've completely
> misunderstood the way EROS works, I can confidently claim that
> orthogonal persistance is something we definitely do *not* want. It
> wouldn't help the goals of the Hurd at all. Actually, I'm pretty sure it
> would hinder them.

Umm. Well, anybody can claim anything they want...

Your article raises some good questions, but you make some rather broad
leaps to get to your conclusions, and I think that some of them are

However, it is 5am locally, so I will respond later.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]